Insights

MEDICAL DEVICES: REGULATORY OBLIGATIONS IN ITALY

Medical devices are classified into four classes depending on their characteristics and safety profile (e.g. invasiveness , dependence on a source of energy, duration of contact with the body):

  • class I, less critical, includes most of non-invasive medical devices which are not dependent on a source of energy, such as patches or glasses, and contains also two other sub-classes:
    • class Im (medical devices having a measuring function, such as thermometers);
    • class Is (sterile medical devices);
  • class IIa, medium-risk, includes medical devices which could be invasive and dependent on a source of energy but do not interact dangerously with the body, such as contact lenses or tracheal tubes;
  • class IIb, medium/high-risk, includes medical devices that interact dangerously with the body, such as ureteral stents or blood bags;
  • class III, high-risk, includes most of implantable medical devices or medical devices interacting with the functions of vital organs or containing drugs or animal derivatives, such as coronary stents, joint implants, prosthetic heart valves or breast implants.

Medical devices can be marketed in Europe after obtaining the CE certification, which guarantees that they are compliant with the essential requirements established by the European legislation. CE certification is issued by an accredited Notified Body, with the only exception of class I medical devices (non-sterile and without measuring function) that can be certified directly by the Manufacturer in view of their low risk.

In Italy, the Manufacturer (or its authorized representative in Europe) must register the medical devices in a dedicated database of the Ministry of Health before they are put into the market. The same requirement applies also to medical device kits, that must be registered into the same database by the Assembler. The data entry can be delegated to a third party.

Many pieces of information should be entered into the database, including name and code of the medical device, its classification (class, GMDN code, etc.), name of the Manufacturer or its authorized representative, a brief description of the medical device together with its intended use, a list of the materials contained in the medical device that comes into direct contact with the patient, sterilization data, information about re-use, scientific bibliography and other information. The CE certification must also be uploaded into the database, together with a safety data sheet and the whole packaging (box, labels and instructions for use, if present). All the information included on the packaging (box, labels and instruction for use, if any) should be in Italian. Multilanguage packaging is also acceptable if it includes the Italian language.

The registration of the medical devices in the sub-database Repertorio, in order to allow the healthcare professionals of the National Healthcare System to access all the information on the medical device entered into the database, is also advisable in the case of participations to public tenders.

Insights

NEW REGULATIONS ON MEDICAL DEVICES AND IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL DEVICES

The new Regulations on medical devices and in-vitro diagnostic medical devices were published in the Official Journal of the European Union on May 5th, 2017 and now replace the existing Directives.

The new Regulations contain a series of extremely important updates, such as the reinforcement of the criteria for designation and processes for oversight of Notified Bodies, the revision of risk classification rules for medical devices and the introduction of a new risk classification system for in vitro diagnostic medical devices, improved transparency through the establishment of a comprehensive EU database on medical devices and of a device traceability system based on Unique Device Identification, the strengthening of post-market surveillance requirements for manufacturers and improved coordination mechanisms between EU countries in the fields of vigilance and market surveillance.

The new rules will apply after a transitional period, namely 3 years for medical devices and 5 years for in vitro diagnostic medical devices.

A proper planning of the activities is advisable. Regulatory Pharma Net team and experts are available to support companies to comply with the new requirements.

Insights

NEW EUDRAVIGILANCE VERSION: IMPACT ON THE ITALIAN PV SYSTEM

On November 22nd, 2017 EMA will launch a new and improved version of EudraVigilance.

This will have impact also to the Italian pharmacovigilance network (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza, RNF). In fact, starting from that date, MAHs will no longer submit spontaneous serious and non-serious Italian ICSRs (including reports from literature) to the RNF but directly through EudraVigilance. Italian ICSRs entered in EudraVigilance will be then re-routed to the RNF, two times a day.  Consumers and healthcare professionals will continue to send to the RNF the ADRs. These cases will be then transmitted to EudraVigilance, every night.

The new version of EudraVigilance will allow MAHs to download Italian ICSRs coming from the RNF. However not all the information relevant to Italian cases will be available in EudraVigilance,  furthermore all unstructured data will remain in local language.

According to the information provided by AIFA during a recent Workshop, the registration to the RNF will remain mandatory for MAHs. In addition it is highly recommended that MAHs will continue to monitor RNF, in particular for the management of follow-up requests and for the access to all the information relevant to cases (e.g.: attachments such as clinical reports and other documents uploaded in the RNF, the name of the responsible persons of pharmacovigilance of the local healthcare facilities who entered the ICSR in the RNF, etc.).

Further clarifications from AIFA on this topic are expected.

Insights

PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE FOR MEDICAL DEVICES

The presence of at least a Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance (PRRC) is one of the new regulatory obligations introduced by the Regulation (EU) 745/2017 for Manufacturers and European Representatives of medical devices marked according to the Regulation.

The presence of at least a PRRC is in any case recommended also for Manufacturers and European Representatives of medical devices marked according to the previous Directive 93/42/EEC and who benefit from the grace period up to May 26th, 2024.

The PRRC is responsible for ensuring the conformity of medical devices with the quality management system, the update of technical documentation and EU declaration of conformity, the fulfilment of obligations relating to vigilance and post-marketing surveillance, and the fulfilment of obligations relating to clinical investigations in case of investigational devices.

The PRRC shall have:

  • a formal qualification in law, medicine, pharmacy, engineering or another relevant scientific discipline and at least one year of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems relating to medical devices
  • or alternatively four years of professional experience in regulatory affairs or in quality management systems relating to medical devices without any particular formal qualification.

The PRRC shall be available permanently and continuously and must have decision-making autonomy in relation to his/her own competences and responsibilities. It is also possible to assign the role of PRRC to more than one person, provided that each has the required qualifications and that the respective competences and responsibilities are established in the respective appointment forms (so-called joint and several liability is excluded).

The role of PRRC can be delegated to a third person outside the company only for SMEs with less than 50 employees and annual turnover less than € 10M.

The identity of the PRRCs should be reported by the company in the EUDAMED.

Regulatory Pharma Net (RPN) is available to provide your company with any updates on the medical device regulatory framework and to assist on all regulatory needs related to medical devices.

Feel free to contact us at info@regulatorypharmanet.com

Insights

USABILITY ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES

The Regulations (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) and 2017/746 (IVDR) require the demonstration of compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs) for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices.

In line with the provisions of MDR Article 61 (1) and IVDR Article 56(1), the clinical/performance evaluation should be appropriate in view of the device claims and characteristics.

In case the demonstration of conformity with GSPRs based on clinical data is not deemed appropriate, the manufacturer shall demonstrate conformity based on the results of performance evaluation, bench testing, preclinical evaluation, and usability assessment.

Usability testing aims to verify how the user interacts with a device and is a key part of overall device risk management and safety, ensuring that the device is safe and effective for the end users. Notably, the approval of a device is frequently deferred or even rejected if the manufacturer does not provide sufficiently positive usability testing data.

Usability tests can also aim to assess the usability and appeal of the device that have commercial relevance but are outside of regulatory expectations

Usability testing should be managed according to the intended use environment and intended users of the device, taking into consideration for example whether the device might be used in a hospital or at home, by health professionals or unskilled patients or caregivers, etc. Intended users are asked to perform specific tasks with the device, in order to evaluate its interactive qualities. Desirable interactive qualities include attributes such as ease of learning, ease of use, and avoidance and recovery from a possible misuse.

Usability testing should include four main steps:

  1. planning (defining test environment, representative users and goals, and developing a test protocol and other documents required)
  2. recruiting
  3. test conduction (including evaluation of the users’ interactions with the device and final interview)
  4. analysis of the results and findings.

Regulatory Pharma Net (RPN) is available to provide your company with any updates on the device regulatory framework and to assist on all regulatory needs including the conduction of usability tests for your medical devices and in vitro diagnostic devices.

Feel free to contact us at info@regulatorypharmanet.com

Insights

PERIODIC SAFETY UPDATE REPORTS (PSURs) ACCORDING TO REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)

The MDR requires manufacturers of class IIa, class IIb, and class III devices to prepare and submit a Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) at least annually for each medical device. Manufacturers of class I devices do not have to prepare a PSUR: instead, they should prepare a Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) Report.

PSUR is a report that summarizes the results and conclusions of the analysis of post-market surveillance data gathered as a result of the PMS Plan for medical devices. PSUR must be updated whenever there are new safety information or significant changes in the benefit/risk assessment of the device. Manufacturers are required to submit PSURs for medical devices through the EU database EUDAMED, ensuring PSURs are in compliance with EUDAMED requirements, annually for class IIb and class III devices and every two years for class IIa devices. Manufacturers of legacy devices should not submit PSUR in EUDAMED but should make it available upon request to Competent Authorities and Notified Bodies.

The MDCG 2022-21Guidance on Periodic Safety Update Report (PSUR) according to Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR)” of December 2022 provides valuable information on how to prepare a PSUR that meets the requirements of the MDR. This guidance is applicable to medical devices which have been certified under MDR or MDD 93/42/EEC or AIMDD 90/385/EEC. It does not apply to in vitro diagnostic medical devices which have been certified under IVDR (EU) 2017/746 or IVDD 98/79/EEC.

MDCG guidance also includes a template for the presentation of data in the PSUR, that offers a recommended structure for presenting the PSUR, designed to ensure that the information required by the MDR is included in a complete and consistent manner, with specific sections for device description, post-market surveillance data, Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCAs) and Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPAs) initiated, and other relevant information, simplifying the preparation of PSURs by Manufacturers and also the review process by competent authorities.

Regulatory Pharma Net (RPN) has extensive experience in regulatory affairs and can provide expert advice on how to meet regulatory requirements, being available to provide your company with any updates on the device regulatory framework and to assist on all regulatory needs including the preparation of PSURs for your medical devices.

Feel free to contact us at info@regulatorypharmanet.com

Insights

Vigilance system for CE-marked medical devices: insights from the new MDCG 2024-1

The MDCG 2024-1Guidance on the vigilance system for CE-marked devices document, recently endorsed by the Medical Device Coordination Group, brings forth significant updates to the vigilance system for CE-marked medical devices.

Aimed at harmonizing vigilance reporting, the guidance offers a detailed framework for manufacturers on how to report individual serious incidents, implement periodic summary reporting, and understand the nuances of trend reporting. The guidance emphasizes the importance of reporting any serious incidents to the relevant Competent Authority. It also outlines the option to report similar serious incidents involving the same device or device type within the context of a Periodic Summary Report. Additionally, the guidance covers Trend Reporting of any statistically significant increase in the frequency or severity of incidents that are not serious incidents or expected undesirable side effects. With its emphasis on detailed incident reporting and the utilization of IMDRF terminologies for categorized adverse event reporting, MDCG 2024-1 represents a pivotal step towards enhancing the regulatory oversight of medical devices within the EU.

Regulatory Pharma Net (RPN) is available to provide your company with any updates on the medical device regulatory framework and to assist on all regulatory needs.

Feel free to contact us at info@regulatorypharmanet.com

Insights

GVP Module XVI Addendum 1 on Risk Minimization for Embryo-Fetal Risks

The European Medicines Agency has finalized the Guideline on Good Pharmacovigilance Practices (GVP) Module XVI Addendum I, addressing risk minimization measures for medicinal products with embryo-fetal risks. This guidance, effective 29 August 2025, aims to prevent or minimize exposure of an embryo or fetus to teratogenic substances.

Intended actions to prevent exposure of an embryo/fetus to a medicinal product with embryo-fetal risks include:

  • Risk counselling to be conducted by a healthcare professional for female patients who have reproductive potential
  • Actions to avoid becoming pregnant or contraceptive measures for female patients taking the medicinal product
  • Pregnancy testing to ensure excluding pregnancy before initiating the treatment
  • Supervised treatment by experienced or specialist physicians, including regular medication reviews
  • Avoiding blood and semen/sperm donation while taking the medicinal product, as this may expose a pregnant female recipient to risk

Intended actions if exposure of an embryo/fetus to a medicinal product with embryo-fetal risks may have occurred include:

  • Interrupting the treatment
  • Switching to suitable alternative treatment
  • Dose reduction
  • Specific prenatal monitoring

Risk minimization measures applied to embryo-fetal risks include:

  • routine measures such as visual warnings on packaging (e.g., "Can seriously harm an unborn baby") and disallowing free samples
  • additional measures such as educational/safety advice materials tailored for healthcare professionals and/or patients and pregnancy prevention programmes (a combination of intended actions and risk minimization measures) for high-risk substances.

RPN will provide any further update and is available to provide full support for pharmacovigilance activities.

 

Insights

Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance

The Working Group XIV of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) just released a comprehensive draft report on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in pharmacovigilance.

The report highlights how AI can revolutionize pharmacovigilance by enhancing signal detection, literature screening and data analysis. AI’s ability to manage large datasets, automate routine tasks and accelerate signal detection will significantly improve the speed and comprehensiveness of identifying safety concerns. AI can also automate the process of screening scientific literature for relevant safety data, ensuring that critical safety information is not overlooked. This automation will improve consistency and reliability, allowing professionals to focus on higher-level analysis and decision-making, and enabling prompt action to protect patient health.

The report points out that, despite the immense potential of AI to optimize pharmacovigilance, human oversight remains essential and ensures the accuracy of AI outputs, addressing concerns like automation bias and over-reliance on AI systems. AI applications must be evaluated through a risk-based approach, considering both the likelihood and impact of risks, especially for high-risk applications directly affecting patient safety, which require stringent oversight.

AI applications in pharmacovigilance must also comply with data protection standards to safeguard sensitive patient information and avoid biases that could disadvantage certain populations.

As AI continues to shape the future of pharmacovigilance, it is crucial to remain mindful of the regulatory frameworks that govern its use. The EMA, US FDA and other global regulatory bodies are closely monitoring these developments, providing guidance and establishing policies to ensure AI is used ethically and effectively within pharmacovigilance systems.

RPN will provide any further update and is available to offer full support for pharmacovigilance activities, including the integration and use of AI in these processes.

The draft report can be found HERE.

Insights

Management of Suspected Adverse Reactions for Radiopharmaceuticals

The Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) has published a document providing regulatory clarifications on managing reports of suspected adverse reactions associated with the use of radiopharmaceuticals, depending on their specific use and/or authorization status.

The following are key clarifications:

  1. Radiopharmaceuticals with national marketing authorization: adverse reaction reports for radiopharmaceuticals authorized in Italy must be reported through National Pharmacovigilance Network (RNF) and/or Eudravigilance per Directive 2001/83/EC (as amended) and Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004, and national guidelines such as Ministerial Decree 30 April 2015.
  2. Radiopharmaceuticals for special use: products authorized under special provisions (e.g., Law 648/1996, Law 94/1998) also require management of adverse reaction reports via RNF and/or Eudravigilance, highlighting their special-use status.
  1. Radiopharmaceuticals imported, with foreign marketing authorization: these products lack national marketing authorization and are not included in the AIFA's authorized medicines database, so adverse reaction reports must be forwarded to AIFA and transmitted to the foreign Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) that will report them in Eudravigilance.
  2. Industry-prepared radiopharmaceuticals (Legislative Decree 219/2006, art. 5): adverse reaction reports for these patient-specific radiopharmaceuticals are not included in RNF but should be transmitted directly to AIFA.
  3. Hospital-prepared galenic radiopharmaceuticals (Legislative Decree 219/2006, art. 3): Adverse reaction reports for these specific radiopharmaceuticals are not included in RNF but should be transmitted to the Italian Ministry of Health.

RPN will provide any further update and is available to provide full support for pharmacovigilance activities.